Tags
'09, antica terra, Autumnal, cherry pit, cinnamon spice, darkly, floral notes, hay field, Oregon, Pinot Noir, Willamette Valley, yellow leaves
Autumnal Pinot Noir, darkly.
Fresh violet garnet hue.
Wet floral notes, heady, red fruit, somehow enriched by slight reductive tones. A bit of cinnamon, dry violet, yellow leaves, carpentry spice, graphite, vitamin before plush cherry and sweet rubber. Quite exhilarating, actually, as the warmish, funky and earthy complexity resides behind energetic and juicy aromas. The nose seems to recede with time and oxygen…not to worry, this seems a good indication that the wine isn’t really ready and wants to develop.
The palate quickly consumes the air to show forwardly, cool-toned and persistent. The reduction doesn’t show it self and the wine is less heady and more precise. Velvet, hairy and earthen, there are nice veins of raspberry and cherry pit, agave, wet leaves, rustic hay field and cinnamon spice but also quite fleshy. A bit tart on the finish, which I expect in the ’09’s. Judicious oak. Very wet, dark flavors, full palate yet dynamic throughout the night in the glass. Again, it begs for some time to knit. Glad to have a couple more in storage.
Should get better over next 7 years, or more.
fish*wine*ski said:
I have this and a Botanica tucked away in our cellar from ’09. Haven’t tasted either of them from that year yet. Trying to wait. Got to taste the ’06 and ’07 side by side and there was something very special about the ’07. Have one more that I am trying to save for another year or two.
Seler d'Or said:
Nice! Antica Terra in my experience tends to be a bigger style that can be silky but more reductive. They have a Roussane coming out soon that is to die for…their Chardonnay is quite beautiful as well. I’m finding that ’09 Pinot may show better on the earlier side of the bell curve, as it was a hot year like ’06 and ’03. I went to the Oregon WIne Symposium this week and saw a slide for anthocyanin content in Oregon Pinots from the last few years. The data showed lower levels of anthocyanins (flavoring and textural components) in ’06, ’08 and ’09 than ’07, which was a cooler year, and one that was panned by big critics, but can be, like you say, a beautiful vintage from the right producer. I think that hits on what I am learning more and more: it is all about producer. Sure vintage matters, but the best producers understand how to work with that vintage variation to craft a ‘consistant’ but ‘transparent’ wine. Cheers!
fish*wine*ski said:
Thanks for the advice on ’09.
I hope you don’t mind, “reductive,” what does that mean to you?
Seler d'Or said:
No worries! Wow, where to start… I might direct you elsewhere, but to start: many Pinot Noirs and a vast majority of white wines are produced reductively. Reductive is a word that describes a vinification style first and foremost. Many wines are produced ‘reductively’, which means the vintner aims to exclude oxygen at points where the wines character will be compromised and compacted by the effect of ‘oxidation’. On the other side of this coin, is reduction, which also can compromise and compact wines, though oxidation is a forever thing and reduction can blow off with air in the best cases, though it can also be a forever thing. In this case, reduction describes sensory characters that are present in wines as a result of reduced sulfer compounds. Reduction for me comes across as flint, match stick, hard boiled egg, rubbery, burnt, hairy, garlic, onion, fresh asphalt… Wow, I could go on and on, but this (http://bit.ly/x2MjBm) is a great read and will answer all your questions with better background, science and the like. I gotta go hustle some wine. Thanks for being so inquisitive and for your support of my ramblings:) May Bacchus always bless you with overflowing glasses of REALwine!
fish*wine*ski said:
Many thanks!